Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 01:01
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Tony Awards: Predicting the Winners Using Just Math - The Hollywood Reporter
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Is there a correlation between sweating during sleep and high body temperature and sugar levels?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
When you have seven hours to kill, what should one do?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
China-US Deal Didn’t Address Some Rare Earths Controls: Reuters - Bloomberg.com
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
This Chinese Spacecraft Is Traveling to One of Earth’s Quasi-Moons - WIRED
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
The Sun Is Causing Starlink Satellites To Drop From Space - Daily Kos
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.